
Student Apathy in Departmental Politics: A Call for Renewed Engagement
- psychlensui
- Mar 27
- 2 min read
By Victor Alawode
The recent decline in students’ participation in politics has become alarming in recent days, raising concern about the future of student leadership and representation. In a recent interview, Miss Shalom Oluwatimileyin Alonge, the returning officer of NAPS INEC, provided insight into some of the possible causes of apathy among students in the department of psychology
According to her, students' participation in departmental politics has dropped drastically in recent times. This decline is not only due to lack of interest but also, it stems from the combination of psychological, structural and social challenges
A key issue is low awareness. Many students are not fully aware of the available position, the responsibilities attached to it, and the eligibility criteria. This gap creates a disconnect, making the electoral process feel distant and almost inaccessible
She further explained that students are not only uninterested in politics but that other departmental activities have also faced a decline in students’ participation. When students feel disconnected from the department,they are less likely to take on leadership roles. Over time, this weakens the sense of collective responsibility which is needed for a vibrant political culture.
Miss Alonge also highlighted personal and psychological factors affecting participation such as fear of criticism, failure and political tension. Many students are not willing to face public scrutiny or the possibility of losing. Others perceive departmental politics as stressful and conflict-driven; as a result, even capable students decide to stay on the sidelines.
Academic pressure also contributes to reluctance as many students perceive politics as too demanding and that it will have a negative effect on their academics. Furthermore, the perception of favoritism in electoral outcomes also undermines trust in the process, discouraging potential candidates from stepping forward.
While the electoral committee continues to operate within existing structures to ensure a fair and transparent electoral process, increasing students participation is a collective responsibility. Clear communication and awareness must be matched by both the student leaders and the whole student body. Leaders should inspire and mentor others while students should be ready to take responsibility by getting involved, supporting one another and considering leadership roles for themselves.
In her closing remarks, Alonge delivered a strong message to the student body:
“The department is for all of us and its future depends on our involvement.
If we don’t step forward to lead no one else will carry our voices or make the changes we want to see.
Leadership is not just about holding a position, it’s about making a difference, shaping our community and standing up for our ideas.
Every voice matters and every action counts.
Don’t wait for someone else to take the lead, don’t wait for “others to do it”
This is your chance to step up, get involved and help build the NAPS we all want to be part of.”
The message is clear and concise, a positive shift in student participation requires more than a structural review but also a shift in mindset. Only through collective effort will the departmental politics be transformed into a place that is inclusive and participatory.




Comments